88A13 Weld-On Conveyor Chain Sprocket 2.753

88A13 Weld-On Conveyor Chain Sprocket 2.753" Bore To Fit Our Y-Hub

Marsoni

M251S

$128.31

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

88A13 Weld-On Conveyor Chain Sprocket 2.753" Bore To Fit Our Y-HubProduct Details : 88A13 Weld On Conveyor Chain Sprocket 2. 753" Bore To Fit Our Y Hub Part No: C88YY13 Product Type: Weld On Conveyor Chain Sprocket Sprocket No.: 88A13 Chain No.: 88 Bore: Stock Bore Bore Size: 2. 753" To Fit Our Y Hub No. Of Teeth: 13 Pitch: 2. 609" Pitch Diameter: 10. 9" Plate Thickness: 0. 862" Material(s): Carbon Steel *Please note 88 Sprockets above fit the following chains: (H78, H78RT, WR78, H74, 81X, C188, SS188, 88K) For any

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your 88A13 Weld-On Conveyor Chain Sprocket 2.753" Bore To Fit Our Y-Hub orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your 88A13 Weld-On Conveyor Chain Sprocket 2.753" Bore To Fit Our Y-Hub ships.

Need Help?
Questions about 88A13 Weld-On Conveyor Chain Sprocket 2.753" Bore To Fit Our Y-Hub, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for 88A13 Weld-On Conveyor Chain Sprocket 2.753" Bore To Fit Our Y-Hub in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Cheap and looks nice, tbh. I orders a 42wx28l and it was a nice fit. I order 28L so the seam usually can sit above my ankle or shoe but It was a bit longer compared to my other various pants at 28L, it felt more like a 30L. I’ve noticed the waist seems to fit a bit larger than I’m used to but overall a nice fit and material. One thing worth mentioning is the stitching at the bottom seems a bit loose.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on January 28, 2026

Verified Purchase

JFMP

Louisville, US

★★★★★ 5

High Quality Cotton, Well Cut

Size: 36W x 32L, Color: Black

I was pretty impressed with the high quality of these pants. Remove the Amazon label and you wouldn't think twice if it had a Gap, Banana Repblic or Levi's instead. They are well cut and well stitched. I ordered black and the color looks great too. Fits to size.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 9, 2026

Verified Purchase

tibbs

Port Orchard, US

★★★★★ 5

Great fit

Size: 36W x 32L, Color: Dark Khaki

My boys love these pants. College son prefers them when he is golfing. They fit well and are comfortable. He usually wears southern tide brand which are extremely pricey. So happy to have found these. Already ordered in multiple colors. They are nice and thin for Florida weather

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 2, 2026

Verified Purchase

Nandita Pai

Pawtucket, US

★★★★★ 5

Great Pants

Size: 31W x 28L, Color: Black

I wasn’t sure what to expect when I ordered these, but I’m really glad I did. The pants look even better in person than in the photos , the color is accurate and the fabric has a nice, quality feel to it. The fit is spot on. I bought it in 3-4 colors.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 30, 2026

Verified Purchase

Wade M

Boise, US

★★★★★ 3

Decent for the price, but inconsistent quality

Size: 33W x 29L, Color: Dark Grey

Quality can be hit or miss. I ordered several pairs of the same "model" and fit is inconsistent. One pair fit great, another pair of a different color felt 3 sizes too small. Leg width can be slightly different from pant to pant or the legs have a bit of a "twist" sewn in them. For the price, I'm not expecting perfection.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 16, 2026